Top 5 Failed Gaming Consoles
3Do
Year of Release: 1993, stopped production in 1996
Summary: Spearheaded by EA co-founder Trip Hawkins, Panasonic's foray into video game entertainment was the first game system to use CDs for content delivery. The resulting increase in data storage allowed developers working on the system to blaze trails in the realm of 3D graphics, getting game visuals that much closer to being able to portray the real world.
Virtual Boy
Year of Release: 1995, discontinued in 1996
Summary: With near-total dominance in the handheld gaming market until the iPhone's release and the best-selling home console ever in the Wii, Nintendo's not a company known for its stumbles. But, when the House of Mario chased after the virtual reality craze of the 1990s, it notched its worst fail ever.
Pippin
Year of Release: 1995, Discontinued in 1997
Summary: Apple's ill-fated foray into gaming, the Pippin was released in the U.S. in 1996. The Internet-capable console so slow that it positively chugged, proved an undisputed embarrassment for the computer giant. With meager processing power and a high price tag, it's no shock the company abandoned Pippin like the illegitimate child of gaming world it was.
Phantom
Year of Release: Never went on sale (Announced in 2002, Delayed pending further funding in 2006)
Summary: In theory the Phantom Entertainment Phantom sounds like the perfect console. Not only can it read and play PC games, virtually creating a massive library of developed product, the Phantom used a direct download content system so there was no need to go to the store and pick up the latest game. It's the future of where we're heading with computer programs so the details of the Phantom were definitely ahead of their time, except that it was never released. Although it was supposed to come out as a direct competitor to the Xbox 360 in 2005, besides a prototype console that was seen in May 2004 the system was never released. Too bad: It received first place in Wired's Vaporwares 2004.
Dreamcast
Year of Release: 1998 in Japan, 1999 in the US; New consoles discontinued in 2001, Refurbished consoles discontinued in 2006
Summary: Widely acknowledged as ahead of its time, the Sega Dreamcast was the first console to be able to plug into the internet with a built-in modem. It took CDs instead of cartridges like the standard today, and it's still possible to find new games, albeit they're typically fan-programed freeware releases. It also marked Sega's sixth and final home gaming console release, as they have no plans to follow up their failed system.
Apple Now World’s Largest Tech Company

Share price of Microsoft (MSFT) and Apple (AAPL) over 10 years, as plotted by Google Finance.
Apple’s market capitalization officially passed Microsoft’s Wednesday afternoon, making the Cupertino, California, company — for the first time — the largest technology company in the world.
With a market cap of $241.5 billion versus Microsoft’s $239.5 billion, Apple also became the second-largest company on the S&P 500, according to Standard & Poor’s analyst Howard Silverblatt. At the moment, only Exxon Mobil is bigger.
Market cap is a measure of the total value of all the outstanding shares of a company, and it’s a proxy for what investors think the company is worth, taking into account future earnings and future growth. As such, it’s a measure of expectations, not reality: Apple’s annual revenue was $42.9 billion in the most recent fiscal year, versus Microsoft’s $58.4 billion. Both look puny next to Exxon Mobil’s $301.5 billion in annual revenue.
Market cap is also a fickle mistress, and fluctuates wildly depending on stock price, so Apple’s position as the king of the hill may be short lived.
But it’s a significant milestone for a company that looked like a has-been just one decade ago.
Ten years ago, Apple was all but written off by most expert commentators. An also-ran computer company that once dominated geeks’ hearts and minds with the Apple II and the Macintosh, Apple made serious missteps in the 1990s that relegated it to a tiny niche of the overall computer market, with market share in the low single digits. It was all but certain that its share would continue dwindling until the company faded away entirely, like Commodore, Atari, Tandy and dozens of other computer makers before it.
What the commentators didn’t count on was the string of hits Apple would deliver over the next 10 years. Founder Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1996 and removed then-CEO Gil Amelio in 1997, making himself interim CEO (and then eventually dropping the interim title).
Jobs then instituted what can now clearly been seen as a far-reaching strategy to consolidate and simplify Apple’s product line, while gradually leveraging the company’s strengths (ease of use, consumer-friendly branding, attractive design, and high margins) to expand into new areas of consumer technology.
Jobs also carefully created a new company culture, one that’s centered on innovation, control and secrecy. That approach has alienated many people — and runs counter to Silicon Valley received wisdom about the value of openness and sharing — but the proof is in the pudding. With a CEO of Jobs’ caliber, at least, that kind of top-down control works.
This list of product rollouts tells the story:
- iMac (Bondi Blue) – 1998
- iBook (clamshell) – 1999
- iPod with scroll wheel – 2001
- Mac OS X – 2001
- iTunes Store – 2003
- MacBook (switch to Intel) – 2006
- iPhone – 2007
- App Store + iPhone SDK – 2008
- iPad – 2010
By 2010, Apple had firmly established its dominance (in mindshare and innovation, if not in absolute numbers) in three areas: computers, MP3 players and smartphones; the company also controls an increasingly large marketplace for music, video and applications with iTunes, which counts its users in the hundreds of millions and has served more than 10 billion songs, 200 million TV shows, 2 million films and 3 billion apps. Apple’s now the largest distributor of music in the United States with 26.7 percent market share, according to a Billboard analysis.
The recent introduction of the iPad — Apple claims over a million have been sold so far — may not move the needle much in terms of revenue, but it’s probably what pushed the company’s stock over the top. Early numbers of 200,000 sales per week suggest that Apple’s iPad is on track to outsell the Mac.
The iPad’s launch epitomized the Apple way: It’s a beautifully designed, precisely engineered piece of hardware, based on a software and apps platform largely controlled by Apple, and introduced through a carefully orchestrated marketing program that encompassed every detail of public relations, advertising and even retail presentation.
As a result, the iPad captured the imagination of the press and of investors worldwide, and has surely helped propel the company’s stock price to its current heights.
The stuff of business school case studies, to be sure. But it’s a feat that few companies have been able to pull off.
Article contributed by: Dylan F. Tweney
Google May Pull Out of China Soon!

Both Google and the Chinese government appear to be leaking word that the search firm may soon shutter its operations there as negotiations between the two break down.
The Wall Street Journal reported today that the Chinese government has begun informing news Web sites in that country that Google's Chinese site is likely to close soon.
Google first threatened to halt its operations in China after disclosing in January that an attack on its network from inside China was aimed at exposing the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists. At the time, Google also said it was reconsidering its willingness to censor search results of users in China as required by the government.
Google has since been negotiating with the Chinese government to find a way to continue operating in the country. Google did not respond today to requests for comment on the state of the negotiations with China.
"I think Google thought China would be flexible," said Rob Enderle, an analyst with the Enderle Group.
"As the US government has often found, flexibility isn't something you generally look for in China with regard to Western ideas of what human rights should be. This is China playing hard ball, and it once again would indicate that when you negotiate with a government, you are generally at a massive disadvantage."
Google's continuing stand against China has been met mostly with support from industry watchers, who say it is helping the search giant has overcome the major hit in good will it's taken in recent years by ceding to China's censorship demands.
Dan Olds, an analyst with The Gabriel Consulting Group, said the latest reported statements on the negotiations probably indicate that there's been a major rift between the two sides.
"I think that the latest reports we're hearing about Google leaving China signal an authentic breakdown in talks rather than typical posturing," Olds said.
"From what I'm seeing, there has been a long-term philosophical conflict at Google ever since they decided to play by the Chinese government's rules on search. I think Google's stand on principal now, is in large part fueled by their discomfort in agreeing to play the role of censor in the first place. It's goes against their fundamental belief in freedom of information and the social good arising from that," he added.
If Google does leave China, Microsoft could be hit harder by critics of its decision not to censor search results in China.
Microsoft executives have made clear of late that the company will remain in China no matter what the resolution of Google's battle with the government there.
While Enderle said that Microsoft shouldn't suffer too much ill will from staying in China and continuing to censor search results, Olds suggested that the company could be pummeled by bad press.
"Google leaving China while Microsoft stays and, assumedly, continues to cooperate with the government by censoring content may certainly bring some bad press to Microsoft," added Olds. "No one argues that China censoring the Internet is a good thing or that it is within their rights, but companies have complied with this requirement in order to get a piece of the massive and growing Chinese market. If Microsoft continues to run censored search for China, I would expect to hear plenty of widespread criticism - some of it perhaps even fueled by Google."


